Introduction
AI and Excessive-Efficiency Computing (HPC) workloads are rising extra complicated, requiring {hardware} that may sustain with large processing calls for. NVIDIA’s GPUs have grow to be a key a part of this, powering every thing from scientific analysis to the event of huge language fashions (LLMs) worldwide.
Two of NVIDIA’s most important accelerators are the A100 and the H100. The A100, launched in 2020 with the Ampere structure, introduced a serious leap in compute density and adaptability, supporting analytics, coaching, and inference. In 2022, NVIDIA launched the H100, constructed on the Hopper structure, with a fair larger efficiency increase, particularly for transformer-based AI workloads.
This weblog supplies an in depth comparability of the NVIDIA A100 and H100 GPUs, overlaying their architectural variations, core specs, efficiency benchmarks, and best-fit purposes that can assist you select the appropriate one to your wants.
Architectural Evolution: Ampere to Hopper
The shift from NVIDIA’s Ampere to Hopper architectures represents a serious step ahead in GPU design, pushed by the rising calls for of recent AI and HPC workloads.
NVIDIA A100 (Ampere Structure)
Launched in 2020, the A100 GPU was designed as a versatile accelerator for a variety of AI and HPC duties. It launched Multi-Occasion GPU (MIG) expertise, permitting a single GPU to be break up into as much as seven remoted situations, enhancing {hardware} utilization.
The A100 additionally featured third-generation Tensor Cores, which considerably boosted deep studying efficiency. With Tensor Float 32 (TF32) precision, it delivered a lot sooner coaching and inference with out requiring code modifications. Its up to date NVLink doubled GPU-to-GPU bandwidth to 600 GB/s, far exceeding PCIe Gen 4, enabling sooner inter-GPU communication.
NVIDIA H100 (Hopper Structure)
Launched in 2022, the H100 was constructed to satisfy the wants of large-scale AI, particularly transformer and LLM workloads. It makes use of a 5 nm course of with 80 billion transistors and introduces fourth-generation Tensor Cores together with the Transformer Engine utilizing FP8 precision, enabling sooner and extra memory-efficient coaching and inference for trillion-parameter fashions with out sacrificing accuracy.
For broader workloads, the H100 introduces a number of key upgrades: DPX directions for accelerating Dynamic Programming algorithms, Distributed Shared Reminiscence that permits direct communication between Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs), and Thread Block Clusters for extra environment friendly job execution. The second-generation Multi-Occasion GPU (MIG) structure triples compute capability and doubles reminiscence per occasion, whereas Confidential Computing supplies safe enclaves for processing delicate knowledge.
These architectural modifications ship as much as six instances the efficiency of the A100 via a mix of extra SMs, sooner Tensor Cores, FP8 optimizations, and better clock speeds. The result’s a GPU that isn’t solely sooner but in addition purpose-built for right now’s demanding AI and HPC purposes.
Architectural Variations (A100 vs. H100)
Characteristic | NVIDIA A100 (Ampere) | NVIDIA H100 (Hopper) |
Structure Title | Ampere | Hopper |
Launch 12 months | 2020 | 2022 |
Tensor Cores Technology | third Technology | 4th Technology |
Transformer Engine | No | Sure (with FP8 assist) |
DPX Directions | No | Sure |
Distributed Shared Reminiscence | No | Sure |
Thread Block Cluster | No | Sure |
MIG Technology | 1st Technology | 2nd Technology |
Confidential Computing | No | Sure |
Core Specs: A Detailed Comparability
Analyzing the core specs of the NVIDIA A100 and H100 highlights how the H100 improves on its predecessor in reminiscence, bandwidth, interconnects, and compute energy.
GPU Structure and Course of
The A100 relies on the Ampere structure (GA100 GPU), whereas the H100 makes use of the newer Hopper structure (GH100 GPU). Constructed on a 5nm course of, the H100 packs about 80 billion transistors, giving it better compute density and effectivity.
GPU Reminiscence and Bandwidth
The A100 was obtainable in 40GB (HBM2) and 80GB (HBM2e) variations, providing as much as 2TB/s of reminiscence bandwidth. The H100 upgrades to 80GB of HBM3 in each SXM5 and PCIe variations, together with a 96GB HBM3 possibility for PCIe. Its reminiscence bandwidth reaches 3.35TB/s, almost double that of the A100. This improve permits the H100 to course of bigger fashions, use larger batch sizes, and assist extra simultaneous classes whereas decreasing reminiscence bottlenecks in AI workloads.
Interconnect
The A100 featured next-generation NVLink with 600GB/s GPU-to-GPU bandwidth. The H100 advances this to fourth-generation NVLink, rising bandwidth to 900GB/s for higher multi-GPU scaling. PCIe assist additionally improves, shifting from Gen4 (A100) to Gen5 (H100), successfully doubling system connection speeds.
Compute Items
The A100 80GB (SXM) contains 6,912 CUDA cores and 432 Tensor Cores. The H100 (SXM5) jumps to 16,896 CUDA cores and 528 Tensor Cores, together with a bigger 50MB L2 cache (versus 40MB within the A100). These modifications ship considerably larger throughput for compute-heavy workloads.
Energy Consumption (TDP)
The A100’s TDP ranged from 250W (PCIe) to 400W (SXM). The H100 attracts extra energy, as much as 700W for some variants, however affords a lot larger efficiency per watt — as much as 3x greater than the A100. This effectivity means decrease vitality use per job, decreasing working prices and easing knowledge heart energy and cooling calls for.
Multi-Occasion GPU (MIG)
Each GPUs assist MIG, letting a single GPU be break up into as much as seven remoted situations. The H100’s second-generation MIG triples compute capability and doubles reminiscence per occasion, enhancing flexibility for combined workloads.
Type Components
Each GPUs can be found in PCIe and SXM type elements. SXM variations present larger bandwidth and higher scaling, whereas PCIe fashions supply broader compatibility and decrease prices.
Efficiency Benchmarks: Coaching, Inference, and HPC
The architectural variations between the A100 and H100 result in main efficiency gaps throughout deep studying and excessive‑efficiency computing workloads.
Deep Studying Coaching
The H100 delivers notable speedups in coaching, particularly for big fashions. It supplies as much as 2.4× larger throughput than the A100 in combined‑precision coaching and as much as 4× sooner coaching for enormous fashions like GPT‑3 (175B). Unbiased testing reveals constant 2–3× features for fashions corresponding to LLaMA‑70B. These enhancements are pushed by the fourth‑era Tensor Cores, FP8 precision, and general architectural effectivity.
AI Inference
The H100 reveals a fair better leap in inference efficiency. NVIDIA reviews as much as 30× sooner inference for some workloads in comparison with the A100, whereas impartial assessments present 10–20× enhancements. For LLMs within the 13B–70B parameter vary, an A100 delivers about 130 tokens per second, whereas an H100 reaches 250–300 tokens per second. This increase comes from the Transformer Engine, FP8 precision, and better reminiscence bandwidth, permitting extra concurrent requests with decrease latency.
The diminished latency makes the H100 a robust selection for actual‑time purposes like conversational AI, code era, and fraud detection, the place response time is important. In distinction, the A100 stays appropriate for batch inference or background processing the place latency is much less essential.
Excessive‑Efficiency Computing (HPC)
The H100 additionally outperforms the A100 in scientific computing. It will increase FP64 efficiency from 9.7 TFLOPS on the A100 to 33.45 TFLOPS, with its double‑precision Tensor Cores reaching as much as 60 TFLOPS. It additionally achieves 1 petaflop for single‑precision matrix‑multiply operations utilizing TF32 with little to no code modifications, slicing simulation instances for analysis and engineering workloads.
Structural Sparsity
Each GPUs assist structural sparsity, which prunes much less important weights in a neural community in a structured sample that GPUs can effectively skip at runtime. This reduces FLOPs and improves throughput with minimal accuracy loss. The H100 refines this implementation, providing larger effectivity and higher efficiency for each coaching and inference.
Total Compute Efficiency
NVIDIA estimates the H100 delivers roughly 6× extra compute efficiency than the A100. That is the results of a 22% improve in SMs, sooner Tensor Cores, FP8 precision with the Transformer Engine, and better clock speeds. These mixed architectural enhancements present far better actual‑world features than uncooked TFLOPS alone recommend, making the H100 a goal‑constructed accelerator for probably the most demanding AI and HPC duties.
Conclusion
Selecting between the A100 and H100 comes all the way down to workload calls for and price. The A100 is a sensible selection for groups prioritizing value effectivity over velocity. It performs effectively for coaching and inference the place latency is just not important and might deal with massive fashions at a decrease hourly value.
The H100 is designed for efficiency at scale. With its Transformer Engine, FP8 precision, and better reminiscence bandwidth, it’s considerably sooner for big language fashions, generative AI, and sophisticated HPC workloads. Its benefits are most obvious in actual time inference and enormous scale coaching, the place sooner runtimes and diminished latency can translate to main operational financial savings even with the next per hour value.
For prime efficiency, low latency workloads, or massive mannequin coaching at scale, the H100 is the clear selection. For much less demanding duties the place value takes precedence, the A100 stays a robust and price efficient possibility.
In case you are trying to deploy your individual AI workloads on A100 or H100, you are able to do that utilizing compute orchestration. Extra to the purpose, you aren’t tied to a single supplier. With a cloud‑agnostic setup, you may run on devoted infrastructure throughout AWS, GCP, Oracle, Vultr, and others, supplying you with the pliability to decide on the appropriate GPUs on the proper worth. This avoids vendor lock‑in and makes it simpler to change between suppliers or GPU sorts as your necessities evolve
For a breakdown of GPU prices and to match pricing throughout completely different deployment choices, go to the Clarifai Pricing web page. You may also be a part of our Discord channel anytime to attach with AI consultants, get your questions answered about choosing the proper GPU to your workloads, or get assist optimizing your AI infrastructure.