A number of months in the past, we introduced a renewed focus of Protocol on three strategic initiatives: Scale L1, Scale blobs, Enhance UX. Following earlier updates on Scale L1 and Scale blobs, this be aware pertains to our “Enhance UX” observe, and its mission:
Seamless, safe and permissionless expertise throughout the Ethereum ecosystem, for people and establishments.
We see interoperability, and associated tasks introduced on this be aware, as the best leverage alternative throughout the broader UX area over the following 6-12 months, in our place as a public, core Ethereum R&D group.
The near-term technique focuses on areas we imagine will proceed to be elementary elements of interop: Intent-based structure and normal message-passing. For each, our intention is to deal with clear, measurable protocol metrics to drive down latency and value, whereas growing safety and trustlessness. These metrics embrace: Signatures per operation, time-to-inclusion, time-to-fast-confirmation, time-to-finality, and time-to-L2-settlement.
We divide our work in three streams:
- Initialisation: Make intents extra modular and light-weight, and strengthen shared requirements for seamless and safe motion of property throughout all chains.
- Acceleration: Drive latency and prices down, speed up efforts for quicker inclusion, affirmation, finality, and settlement.
- Finalisation: Combine frontier consensus (quick finality) and cryptography (SNARKs with real-time proving) to unlock quick, permissionless crosschain messaging.
Why deal with interop?
The Ethereum ecosystem consists of our L1 mainnet and the various L2s that permissionlessly prolong Ethereum past the L1’s boundaries. These extensions present essential entry factors and scaling alternatives for Ethereum, but additionally deliver their very own challenges, chief amongst them the pressures of fragmentation on the Ethereum expertise and its financial system.
There are various potential definitions of what it means to “resolve interop” and the extent to which interop is already solved. Whereas a lot of the infra and tech is prepared (or quickly shall be), there are a number of steps remaining to truly get these options into the arms of all customers and inject it seamlessly into their every day UX.
At its simplified core, the important thing elements to speed up interop boil all the way down to unlocking quick crosschain message-passing and standardisation. At present, message-passing is partially bottlenecked by sluggish settlement instances. Whereas work continues to take away these bottlenecks, we now have infrastructure we will leverage at present to resolve the most typical consumer flows and supply a unified expertise throughout the Ethereum ecosystem.
Nonetheless, interop isn’t the one UX challenge dealing with Ethereum customers. On the finish of this be aware, we spotlight distinct EF initiatives coping with completely different facets of user-centric growth, with a stronger accent on safety and privateness. Past, many extra alternatives to enhance Ethereum UX shall be sought and delivered by tasks in our ecosystem. We sit up for celebrating their achievements and persevering with to collaborate to be able to strengthen the core properties of Ethereum.
Stream 1: Initialisation
Intents are one mechanism to enhance UX for crosschain interactions, abstracting away the complexities of crosschain mechanics and distilling the end result of an motion. We outline intents as a high-level expression of what a consumer needs to realize onchain, with out prescribing the precise low-level transactions that ought to be executed. Intents are declarative (“I need this end result, I’m versatile about the way it’s achieved”), whereas transactions are prescriptive (“name this contract with these parameters”).
The intent layer sits between order-flow interfaces (wallets) and deeper interoperability infrastructure (bridges, both canonical or non-public). As such, it’s a strategic level to assist, leveraging each the wallets’ experience to offer the perfect UX and the bridges’ means to settle the various property deployed throughout Ethereum.
But intent protocols can usually introduce belief assumptions on solver intermediaries, which might create censorship vectors and privateness points. Different approaches, like crosschain messaging bridges or the Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL), additionally advance interop with out solver dependencies. Taken collectively, these efforts broaden the design area for interoperability.
Venture #1: Open Intents Framework
Takeaway: Laying down the muse of impartial infrastructure supporting intents-based crosschain protocols.
The Open Intents Framework (OIF) offers modular infrastructure for every of the intent layers: Origination, achievement, settlement and rebalancing. It’s an extensible framework laying the groundwork for additional refinements, in the direction of safer, cheaper and quicker settlement of consumer interactions throughout chains. The Open Intents Framework is a collaborative effort together with core contributors from the Ethereum Basis plus Throughout, Arbitrum, Hyperlane, LI.FI, OpenZeppelin, Taiko, Wonderland, and plenty of others – a significant step ahead for a unified but differentiated method to interoperability.
The OIF was constructed from the bottom as much as be as light-weight and customisable as potential, to be able to accommodate completely different necessities and use circumstances throughout Ethereum’s ecosystem of L2s. This modularity and customization permits for simple swapping of every piece of the intents stack, to make it straightforward to change out mechanisms which can have weaker belief assumptions or safety ensures. The OIF is dedicated to enhance settlement ensures together with safety, censorship resistance and privateness.
Manufacturing-ready sensible contract implementations of the Open Intents Framework are stay at present with structure diagrams and developer documentation. By Q3 2025, contributing groups are finalising sensible contract foundations and requirements, finishing auditing, and including just a few extra validation mechanisms. In This autumn 2025, the OIF could have accomplished the open-source solver and crosschain validation module. Groups could have entry to the total reference solver implementation with configurable chain subscriptions, automated rebalancing capabilities, and modular validation supporting main crosschain verification protocols. New chains will be capable to deploy manufacturing solvers instantly upon launch, eliminating the standard months-long integration cycles.
Venture #2: Ethereum Interoperability Layer
Takeaway: A trustless, censorship-resistant transport layer, making cross-L2 transactions really feel like single-chain transactions.
The Ethereum Interoperability Layer (EIL) focuses on making Ethereum really feel like one chain once more, with out compromising on CROPS values (censorship-resistance, open-source, privateness and safety).
EIL is led by the Chain and Account Abstraction workforce, creators of the ERC-4337 protocol. EIL is a trustless cross-L2 interop layer, enabling seamless multichain transactions whereas holding the consumer in management, preserving privateness and Ethereum-level censorship resistance. Whereas intents are a declarative abstraction (“I need this end result”), the Ethereum Interoperability Layer focuses on prescriptive execution by way of transactions (“listed below are the precise calls to make”) with out trusting intermediaries.
A public design doc shall be launched in October, with extra particulars supplied at Devconnect.
Venture #3: Interop requirements
Takeaway: Decreasing consumer and developer friction throughout the stack with frequent protocols for crosschain operations.
Lastly, a big set of requirements will assist the growth of OIF and EIL, establishing unified design ideas from the consumer to interop backends. These requirements embrace Interoperable addresses (ERC-7828 and ERC-7930), asset consolidation (ERC-7811) and multi-calls (ERC-5792) for improved pockets and app UX, in addition to impartial message-passing infrastructure, comparable to an intent customary (ERC-7683) and a standard messaging interface (ERC-7786).
Up to now, ERC-7683 has been reviewed and revised by a bunch of contributors from Throughout, Uniswap, LI.FI, and OpenZeppelin. The principle change is a higher-level interface redesign to assist a number of intent origination move, particularly for brand spanking new flows comparable to Useful resource Locks and direct-to-filler transfers. Within the spirit of flexibility and modularity, the revised customary will even embrace completely different public sale mechanisms (e.g., Dutch, first-come first-serve) and permit for compatibility with different open-source initiatives like multi-chain inputs and interoperable addresses.
Stream 2: Acceleration
Whereas Stream 1 builds primary companies required for a impartial, user-centric and safe interoperability stack, Stream 2 goals to boost the velocity limits on each node and hyperlink of the community. We deal with 4 key metrics detailed within the sections beneath: L1 time-to-inclusion, L1 time-to-strong-confirmation, L1 time-to-finality and L2 time-to-settlement.
Venture #4: Quick L1 Affirmation Rule
Takeaway: Obtain quick and robust L1 confirmations in 15-30 seconds as a substitute of ready 13-19 minutes for full finality.
Quicker affirmation instances are persistently cited as one of many greatest necessities for higher interop throughout the Ethereum ecosystem. The construction of Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake mechanism has attesters voting on the present state of the chain each slot, with full finality trailing by many slots. Nonetheless, there may be already a approach to get quicker affirmation with provable security, however this isn’t well-known and usable in the intervening time.
Temporary overview of the quick affirmation rule: Utilises the collected votes of attesters to offer a decrease (however nonetheless robust) diploma of affirmation at a a lot earlier time limit, whereas full finality is later obtained (the identical actual approach it’s at present). Underneath well-specified fashions of an adversary, a quicker affirmation rule provides provable security and represents a gorgeous possibility for mechanisms relying in any other case on full finality. We are going to make this quick affirmation rule usable by implementing it in all consensus purchasers and work to combine its endpoint with tasks inquisitive about reducing latency for his or her customers.
Roberto Saltini and Mikhail Kalinin (Consensys) at the moment lead the specification of the quick affirmation rule and its proof of correctness. The TxRx workforce (Consensys) is implementing the rule in Teku, whereas Terence Tsao (Offchain Labs) has supplied an early implementation for Prysm and Harsh Pratap Singh (EPF Fellow) is engaged on a Lighthouse implementation. With additional simplifications anticipated to the specs, and a less complicated path to implementation, we goal Q1 2026 for availability of the quick affirmation rule in all consensus layer purchasers, and can work with accomplice tasks for integration.
Venture #5: Shorter L1 slots
Takeaway: Performing the analysis and engineering groundwork for lowering L1 slot instances asap.
Vital UX enhancements are obtained from shorter L1 slots, and we intention to initially goal 2x shorter slots, from 12 seconds to six seconds. Halving the slot time not solely halves time-to-L1-inclusion for L1 customers, however moreover halves the time-to-strong-confirmation and the time-to-finality for customers of those affirmation guidelines. This permits quicker settlement, much less capital in flight, and lowered charges and latency for customers of interoperability protocols, in addition to a larger incentive to make use of safe L1 settlement.
The challenge requires a number of workstreams: Strong information evaluation for community efficiency and centralisation pressures (at the moment involving Maria Inês Silva, Sam Calder-Masson and Toni Wahrstätter), specs of consensus and execution layer adjustments (involving Dankrad Feist, Justin Traglia and Milos Stankovic) and consumer implementations (early work from Milos Stankovic and Jihoon Track). A lot of this work is unbiased from slot restructuring efforts comparable to transferring to EIP-7732, enshrined Proposer–Builder Separation.
Venture #6: Shorter L2 settlement
Takeaway: Decreasing latency to maneuver property out of rollups decreases rebalancing prices and will increase service high quality of intents.
Optimistic rollups settle within the order of seven days, as soon as a protracted sufficient problem window has remained open to contest the revealed state of the rollup. Shorter withdrawal home windows permits for quicker motion of property from the rollup, and lowers rebalancing prices for solvers, i.e., lowers value for customers of intent protocols. It’s a key lever for intents to settle larger volumes at cheaper charges. A lot progress right here is already underway due to the efforts of many throughout L2 and ZKEVM groups. We are going to work to assist optimistic rollups inquisitive about implementing ZK-based real-time proving, and/or transferring to a safe 2-out-of-3 quicker settlement mechanism.
Stream 3: Finalisation
The ultimate frontier of interoperability on Ethereum is attained with two items of expertise: Actual-time proving and quick finality. Our intention shall be to speed up analysis and prototype initiatives to deliver ahead the timelines of every. To focus on the open-ended nature of this stream, we name tasks right here “Explorations”.
Exploration #1: Interoperability snarkification
All Protocol actions should reckon with the acceleration of SNARKs in the direction of broad availability. As an example, the “Scale L1” observe plans early work in the direction of the progressive integration of this expertise within the core of the Ethereum protocol. Likewise, it’s not potential at present to disregard the snarkification of all the things, specifically because it pertains to interoperability options.
With a strong intents-based method to crosschain UX, the target is to proceed accelerating and solidifying the backends of those programs, to the purpose of lowest friction. Quick settlement permits for quick liquidity rebalancing, chopping prices for intent customers. And past lowered prices and latency, we imagine that snarkification has the potential to redraw the map of asset issuance, bridge primitives and crosschain programmability, enabling amongst different issues synchronous composability with L1. Getting forward of this revolution places us in management to steer our community in the direction of the futures that we want.
With some SNARK-based variations of the quicker L2 settlement mechanism described in Venture #6, optimistic rollups have the potential to unlock a “quick root” in opposition to which their state could be assumed to be settled. But it’s also potential to permissionlessly receive this quick root, and “zkSettle” in opposition to it. Particularly, this type of settlement could also be launched as a mechanism accessible by way of the Open Intents Framework (Venture #1), making certain probably the most sturdy type of intent settlement and maximal consumer safety.
Exploration #2: Quicker L1 finality
We suggest exploring all paths to deliver finality ahead from at present’s 13-19 minutes to the order of seconds. First, shorter slots as described in Venture #5 will halve the finality time, bringing us to 7-10 minutes. Second, beacon chain adjustments might speed up it additional, all the way down to 1-2 minutes. Lastly, changing our present consensus protocol, Gasper, with a leaner and quicker protocol, will yield an additional order of magnitude enchancment, with goal finality obtained in beneath 10 seconds.
The EF Protocol Consensus workforce is engaged on a number of tasks illuminating the choice tree for a strong, performant and decentralised consensus protocol. 3-slot-finality (3SF) is a well-understood protocol acquiring robust security with dynamic availability, a mixture distinctive to protocols comparable to Ethereum’s. Explorations in newer lessons of protocols comparable to Kudzu, Hydrangea or Alpenglow reveal alternatives for enhancements on 3SF with decrease latency and better throughput, however should be designed for Ethereum’s distinctive properties.
Bettering UX has grown to grow to be a multi-faceted effort, with a number of distinct streams of labor tackling points from interoperability, safety and privateness. With this be aware, we’re clarifying our personal interoperability work, and invite you to seek out extra particulars on Trillion Greenback Safety and the Kohaku privateness pockets beneath.
Trillion Greenback Safety
Led by Fredrik Svantes and Josh Stark, the Trillion Greenback Safety (1TS) initiative is an ecosystem-wide effort to improve Ethereum’s safety to assist deliver the world onchain. Part 2 of 1TS tackles UX, together with higher fashions of clear signing, key administration and pockets safety and privateness requirements.
Kohaku
Led by Nicolas Consigny and Vitalik Buterin, the Kohaku challenge develops the mandatory expertise to energy wallets which can be non-public throughout their whole stack. The challenge is developed in collaboration between the EF and varied exterior groups. Kohaku’s core targets are (i) an SDK that exposes robust privateness/safety primitives and (ii) an influence‑consumer pockets that ships on high of that SDK. In a primary part the challenge will deal with the browser extension that targets superior customers introducing privateness and safety features. The extension is designed to protect privateness whereas lowering belief assumptions and eliminating pointless exterior dependencies. The challenge will ship with Helios lightclient, a privateness‑service abstraction, assist for personal addresses, native non-public balances & non-public sends.
