When Nick Turley joined OpenAI in 2022 as the pinnacle of ChatGPT, he was tasked with commercializing the corporate’s analysis. He has made nice strides towards that purpose, rising the product to 800 million weekly lively customers. Now Turley needs to take an excellent greater swing: remodeling ChatGPT into a brand new sort of working system stuffed with third-party apps.
I sat down with Turley this week on the outskirts of San Francisco’s Fort Mason, a former U.S. army put up the place OpenAI held its third annual developer convention, to debate how he’s fascinated by ChatGPT’s future. You could find a transcript of our dialog on the backside of this text.
To show ChatGPT into an working system, Turley tells me he’s drawing inspiration from internet browsers. During the last decade, browsers have emerged as a brand new sort of working system — not within the literal sense like macOS or Home windows, however as a result of they’ve change into the primary place individuals work on computer systems due to a wide range of internet purposes. Turley sees ChatGPT evolving in an analogous manner: a platform that might change how individuals work together with software program.
OpenAI is reportedly creating a browser too. Turley doesn’t affirm or deny this, however he does say browsers are “actually fascinating.” The corporate can also be working with Jony Ive and a group of longtime Apple designers on a household of {hardware} units. Given these efforts, it’s straightforward to see how a ChatGPT working system stuffed with apps might change into a central element of OpenAI’s client ecosystem.
OpenAI has been chasing this concept for some time. In 2023, the corporate launched an array of “AI app retailer” efforts corresponding to ChatGPT plugins and the GPT Retailer. These merchandise didn’t precisely take off, however OpenAI appears to have a greater strategy this time round.
The launch of apps aligns with OpenAI’s want to show ChatGPT into an e-commerce vacation spot. Apps from Expedia, DoorDash, and Uber might result in extra transactions in ChatGPT, one thing OpenAI can now facilitate and seize a few of the income from. Having a product featured in ChatGPT may very well be a significant supply of enterprise for each third-parties and OpenAI.
This may additionally be OpenAI’s most compelling pitch to builders but. Third-parties can now attain ChatGPT’s 800 million customers throughout their on a regular basis conversations. Apps are a part of ChatGPT’s core expertise, fairly than in a separate retailer of widgets. Builders can even construct extra interactive experiences in ChatGPT, past simply chatbots related to their firm’s knowledge.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Nonetheless, the enterprise of operating an working system additionally comes with a number of messy issues, corresponding to tips on how to promote sure apps over others. Turley says OpenAI isn’t ruling out letting some corporations pay for his or her apps to have precedence placement in ChatGPT, however the firm is determining how to do that with out hurting the person expertise.
Third-party builders probably additionally need entry to ChatGPT person knowledge. In a set of tips, OpenAI says app builders should “collect solely the minimal knowledge required to carry out the software’s operate,” but it surely’s unclear what meaning in observe. Turley says OpenAI could construct out new options — corresponding to a partitioned reminiscence in ChatGPT — that might let customers give fine-grained knowledge entry to builders.
One standout remark from our dialog was how Turley views ChatGPT because the “supply automobile” for OpenAI’s nonprofit mission: to develop and distribute synthetic common intelligence (AGI) — extremely autonomous AI techniques — in a manner that advantages humanity. Some OpenAI researchers fear that the corporate’s client enterprise might overpower its nonprofit mission. However in response to Turley, ChatGPT is how OpenAI will distribute AGI to the plenty. How’s that for a spin?
Right here’s my dialog with Nick Turley, Head of ChatGPT, which has been edited for readability and brevity. My questions are in daring, his solutions will not be.

Maxwell Zeff: How are you fascinated by ChatGPT as a platform for different corporations?
Nick Turley: I feel we’re gonna look again at ChatGPT in a pair years and really feel like the present product is within the command line period. It’s actually highly effective, but it surely’s missing one thing essential, which is affordances.
Within the basic working system world, that’s apparent. We favor going to Mac or Home windows and opening purposes, versus remembering all of the instructions. It’s sort of bonkers to me that we’ve scaled the product to 800 million weekly lively customers with the shape issue we now have. It is a bizarre and laborious to develop class, and but it’s rising like loopy.
The evolution we’re attempting to make over the subsequent few years is one the place ChatGPT itself is extra like an working system the place you may come and use purposes. If you wish to write, there’s an app for that. If you wish to code, there’s an app for that. If you wish to work together with items and companies, there are purposes for you.
However we are able to’t construct every little thing ourselves. We’re not going to have a music streaming service, or replicate Coursera’s catalog of academic supplies. We’re not going to get into the enterprise that Expedia and Reserving.com are in. And for that motive, it is sensible to associate.
There’s additionally an entire technology of apps that persons are going to construct that wouldn’t have been potential beforehand. The Ubers of the world solely exist due to the cellular platform, and I’m actually enthusiastic about what these is likely to be for ChatGPT.
We additionally need to give builders, who’ve been with us for the reason that starting, entry to ChatGPT’s 800 million weekly customers. In the event that they’re capable of improve ChatGPT and construct actual companies on high of that, it creates extra winners within the ecosystem.
The place do you draw inspiration from when constructing ChatGPT?
You’ll be able to’t go to 1 spot. I usually inform job candidates they should have first ideas pondering, and in the event that they’re gonna attempt to run a playbook they noticed at Meta or Google, you’re truly gonna run out of opponents to repeat. In terms of [ChatGPT] or Sora, there’s simply zero precedent. So that you sort of must get your analogies from completely different locations.
I feel browsers are actually fascinating as a result of, in some methods, they’ve change into the working system within the final 10 years. How many people truly use desktop apps? You may use Excel or PowerPoint, however most of what we do truly occurs within the browser through application-like issues.
I additionally spent a while trying on the early advertisements for the [Apple] PowerBook. It’s sort of like ChatGPT the place it was this equipment that no one fairly knew every little thing you would do with it. The advertisements have been actually like “It’s a calculator, it’s an alarm clock.”
So there isn’t a single factor you may have a look at, but it surely behooves us to be taught from historical past. If you happen to simply have a look at the final 10 years, there won’t be the right analogous factor.
You talked about browsers and units there. How are you fascinated by increasing ChatGPT into these type elements?
OpenAI is the sort of place the place you dream massive. One class we now have lined is productiveness, which is successfully ChatGPT. However there are such a lot of different product classes to be constructed, and so they’re all going to alter with AI. Leisure is one, which is why I’m enthusiastic about Sora. Social media is one other one. Clearly, {hardware} and entry factors to the Web are fascinating too.
You must actually take into consideration what we’re constructing as a household of merchandise and purposes which can be tied collectively by your account, personalization, and identification layer. I’m actually excited that we’re not boxing ourselves in. Even when we have been simply the ChatGPT firm, there could be infinite issues to construct, however our ambition on what we are able to do for individuals simply goes manner past that.
I’m all for listening to the way you suppose the patron enterprise of OpenAI suits into the nonprofit mission. I’ve heard some individuals say the patron enterprise funds the mission. How do you see it?
The OpenAI I joined was a analysis lab which may ship a demo or two. The truth is, my job description on the time was framed to me as “serving to commercialize OpenAI know-how” — very open ended. At the moment, the product existed to deliver the analysis to life so that folks truly get it. I feel that was true and nonetheless is true, as you may see with Sora. The easiest way to start out a grounded discourse on the profoundness of a know-how is to ship one thing.
Then we moved from that framing to, okay, possibly the product is greater than that. Perhaps the product is definitely the way in which we fund the mission. It turned evident in some unspecified time in the future, even earlier than I received to OpenAI, that that is all going to be very costly.
However after ChatGPT, we began speaking about it a bit otherwise. Our mission is to make sure that AGI advantages all of humanity, and reaches individuals. If you happen to mix that with the perception that AGI might be not this single second in time, however fairly a gradual factor, it’s important to consider product because the supply automobile of the mission. It’s the way in which you truly profit individuals in observe.
If you happen to have a look at what these 800 million persons are doing each week, ChatGPT helps them obtain their targets. I don’t know if you happen to noticed the man within the keynote who taught himself to code at 89. That’s insane to me. I discuss to ChatGPT customers who assist their autistic youngsters by modeling social interactions. I discuss to people who find themselves totally self taught in a language based mostly on what they do with ChatGPT. Like, that’s the mission.
I don’t suppose it’s honest to speak in regards to the client enterprise as a funding automobile. Reasonably, it’s the expression. That’s a method wherein OpenAI has developed, to me not less than, since I’ve joined.
Let’s dive deeper into the apps that have been introduced right now. OpenAI has mentioned that third-parties can solely take the “minimal quantity of knowledge” essential to run an app in ChatGPT. How are you fascinated by person privateness?
From day one, we’re going to ask builders to confide in customers what info they’re requesting. We’re additionally solely going to let [apps] go reside if they’re affordable within the knowledge that they request. We revealed our developer tips [at launch] so individuals gained’t be shocked after we reject their app as a result of it doesn’t adjust to our stance on privateness.
Over the subsequent month, we need to construct methods for customers to present fine-grained entry to builders. I feel Apple has performed an outstanding job with this, the place you may share knowledge simply this time, or on a regular basis, and many others.
To try this effectively, we would want some idea of a partitioned reminiscence in ChatGPT, which we’re nonetheless pondering via. However we’re actually excited in regards to the concept since you may need to preserve sure conversations, like well being, separate from others, corresponding to music. Customers could need to share one, however not the opposite, with an app. So we’re going to have much more to share quickly, as a result of it’s truly a mixed analysis and engineering problem to do that effectively.
The factor that’s uncompromisable for us is transparency. We wish customers, in any respect factors, to grasp what knowledge is likely to be going to a third-party, however the controls will come over time as we construct them out.
DoorDash and Instacart are two corporations that can have apps in ChatGPT quickly sufficient. If I need to order some snacks, how will ChatGPT know which one to go to?
That is the basic query. The easiest way to start out is you present them each. If you happen to’ve used one among them earlier than, we’ll prioritize that one. If you happen to’ve used each, we’ll ask which one you like. We might get extra subtle over time. You may think about one among these apps being a lot greater high quality than one other. Perhaps there could be motive to prioritize one over the opposite.
We now have a number of companions in the identical product classes. I feel essentially the most sleek and respectful technique to deal with that’s to serve each apps.
Are you fascinated by letting corporations pay for his or her apps to have preferential spot placement in ChatGPT?
This is without doubt one of the issues we’re hoping to do some discovery on with builders. There’s this commerce off. You may attempt to determine all of it out prematurely, and roll it out with the announcement, however that most likely means you didn’t discuss to lots of people. Or you would delay it, which implies everybody’s asking questions and doesn’t know precisely what’s going to occur, but it surely offers us the power to really interact.
We selected the latter simply because we all know that constructing this ecosystem goes to be a protracted recreation. It’s not going to occur on day one, and due to this fact it’s higher to be considerate on what kind of distribution mechanisms are and aren’t honest recreation.
On the finish of the day, we wish an important person expertise. So if that will result in apps [surfacing] which can be irrelevant to the person, I don’t suppose we’d prefer it. If this was a lever that helped us prioritize apps which can be actually severe as a result of they’re clearly attempting to spend money on publicity, it may very well be a very good factor. We now have no perspective as of right now. It’s actually one thing that’s provide you with completely different companions.