It’s solely been a day since Netflix introduced an $82.7 billion deal to amass Warner Bros., and the acquisition has already been described as sending Hollywood into “full-blown panic mode,” “probably a loss of life blow to theatrical filmmaking,” and possibly even “the top of Hollywood” itself.
A number of the firmest opposition has come from the Writers Guild of America, which issued an announcement declaring, “This merger should be blocked.”
“The world’s largest streaming firm swallowing certainly one of its largest rivals is what antitrust legal guidelines have been designed to forestall,” the WGA mentioned. “The result would remove jobs, push down wages, worsen circumstances for all leisure staff, elevate costs for customers, and scale back the amount and variety of content material for all viewers.”
Whereas statements from different Hollywood unions weren’t fairly as unequivocal, they nonetheless recommended that there are “many severe questions” concerning the acquisition’s “affect on the way forward for the leisure trade” (as the actors union SAG-AFTRA put it).
The deal got here after a aggressive course of wherein Paramount and Comcast additionally bids. Paramount was attempting to amass all the firm, whereas Netflix will solely purchase purchase the movie and tv studios, in addition to the streaming enterprise, after Warner Bros. strikes ahead with a plan to spin off its TV networks division.
Initially, Paramount was seen because the frontrunner, with its ties to the Trump administration (the studio is now run by David Ellison, son of Oracle co-founder and Trump ally Larry Ellison) easing the best way for regulatory approval. However even earlier than the Netflix deal was introduced, Paramount’s legal professionals despatched an indignant letter complaining about “a tilted and unfair course of,” and Netflix quickly emerged publicly because the winner.
This deal, which is predicted to shut within the third quarter of 2026, would presumably face vital regulatory scrutiny, and never simply from Trump appointees. Senator Elizabeth Warren — a Democrat from Massachusetts and longtime critic of Huge Tech — put out an announcement of her personal describing the deal as “an anti-monopoly nightmare.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
“A Netflix-Warner Bros. [merger] would create one large media large with management of near half of the streaming market — threatening to power Individuals into greater subscription costs and fewer selections over what and the way they watch, whereas placing American staff in danger,” Warren mentioned.
She additionally argued that antitrust enforcement — together with the assessment course of for this deal — should be performed “pretty and transparently” moderately than used to “invite influence-peddling and bribery.”
If the federal government in the end blocks the acquisition, Netflix could be required to pay a $5.8 billion breakup charge. It’s not clear whether or not Warner Bros. would then proceed working as an unbiased firm or would rethink the earlier acquisition presents.
Netflix held an analyst name to debate the deal on Friday morning, and whereas lots of the questions have been targeted on the monetary affect on each corporations, executives additionally tried to handle bigger issues.
For instance, co-CEO Ted Sarandos mentioned he’s “extremely assured within the regulatory course of.”
“This deal is pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-worker, it’s pro-creator, it’s pro-growth,” he added. “And our plans listed below are to work actually intently with all the suitable governments and regulators, however actually assured that we’re going to get all the required approvals that we want.”
Sarandos additionally mentioned that Netflix intends to maintain HBO “working largely as it’s.” And though it’s not one thing Netflix has completed prior to now, Warner Bros. would additionally proceed producing TV reveals for different networks and streaming providers, he mentioned: “We wish to preserve that profitable enterprise working.”
As for the way HBO and HBO Max could be packaged with or folded into the Netflix app, co-CEO Greg Peters mentioned it’s too early to get into specifics, however he mentioned, “Evidently, we expect the HBO model could be very highly effective for customers. We predict that the providing might represent and would represent part of our plans and the way we construction these for customers.”
Past basic issues round consolidation, maybe the largest query is to what extent Netflix will help theatrical releases for the mixed entity’s movies — particularly after Warner Bros. had a record-setting run of field workplace success this 12 months, whereas Netflix’s theatrical releases solely final for a pair weeks and skip main theatrical chains due to the restricted unique window. (This was reportedly the deciding issue wjhen “Stranger Issues” creators the Duffer Brothers signed an unique take care of Paramount.)
For his half, Sarandos mentioned he “wouldn’t have a look at this as a change in strategy for Netflix motion pictures or for Warner motion pictures for that matter,” and he famous that Netflix has launched 30 motion pictures in theaters this 12 months (although once more, often on fewer screens and for a restricted time frame).
Equally, “every part that’s deliberate on going to the theater by way of Warner Bros. will proceed to go to the theaters by way of Warner Bros,” he mentioned. However in the long run, he recommended that “the home windows will evolve” in order that motion pictures come to streaming extra rapidly.
“My pushback has been largely within the reality of the lengthy unique home windows, which we don’t actually consider that client pleasant,” he mentioned.
