
The Dutch Ministry of Finance confirmed on Monday that a few of its techniques have been breached in a cyberattack detected final week.
Officers stated the ministry was notified by a 3rd social gathering of the breach on March 19, and it is nonetheless investigating the cyberattack. An ongoing investigation discovered that the incident impacts some workers.
“The Ministry of Finance’s ICT safety detected unauthorized entry to techniques for numerous main processes throughout the coverage division on Thursday, March 19,” an official assertion revealed.
“Following the alert, a right away investigation was launched, and entry to those techniques has been blocked as of as we speak. This impacts the work of a portion of the workers.”
The ministry added that the cyberattack didn’t impression techniques used to handle tax assortment, import/export rules, and income-linked subsidies, which deal with over 9.5 million tax returns yearly for earnings tax alone.
“Providers to residents and companies offered by the Tax and Customs Administration, Customs, and Advantages haven’t been affected. We are going to replace this message after we can share extra data.”
Though the ministry stated the breach affected a few of its workers, it did not disclose what number of have been affected or whether or not the attackers stole any delicate information. Additionally, no cybercrime group or menace actors have taken duty for the assault.
BleepingComputer reached out to a Ministry of Finance spokesperson with questions in regards to the incident, together with the overall variety of impacted workers and the way lengthy the attackers had entry to the compromised techniques, however a response was not instantly accessible.
In September 2024, the Dutch nationwide police (Politie) was additionally breached in a cyberattack believed to be orchestrated by a “state actor” that stole work-related contact particulars of a number of cops.
Extra lately, in February, Dutch authorities arrested a 40-year-old man for an extortion try after he downloaded confidential paperwork mistakenly shared by the police and refused to delete them except he acquired “one thing in return.”

