Wednesday, September 10, 2025
HomeTechnologyDecoding scientific papers: 1957 information to what researchers imply

Decoding scientific papers: 1957 information to what researchers imply

Decoding scientific papers: 1957 information to what researchers imply

Basic Electrical researcher C. D. Graham wrote the next Glossary for Analysis Studies in a 1957 concern of Metallic Progress. Thanks are as a consequence of The Science Magpie for help with the submit and to Futility Closet for priceless discussions.

It has lengthy been identified that… I have not bothered to search for the unique reference

… of nice theoretical and sensible significance … fascinating to me

Whereas it has not been doable to offer particular solutions to those questions … The experiments did not work out, however I figured I may at the least get a publication out of it

The W-Pb system was chosen as particularly appropriate to indicate the expected behaviour … The guy within the subsequent lab had some already made up

Excessive-purity …
Very excessive purity …
Extraordinarily excessive purity …
Tremendous-purity …
Spectroscopically pure …
Composition unknown apart from the exaggerated claims of the provider

A fiducial reference line … A scratch

Three of the samples have been chosen for detailed research … The outcomes on the others did not make sense and have been ignored

… by accident strained throughout mounting … dropped on the ground

… dealt with with excessive care all through the experiments … not dropped on the ground

Typical outcomes are proven … One of the best outcomes are proven

Though some element has been misplaced in copy, it’s clear from the unique micrograph that … It’s not possible to inform from the micrograph

Presumably at longer instances … I did not take time to search out out

The settlement with the expected curve is great … truthful
… good … poor
… passable … uncertain
… truthful … imaginary
… pretty much as good as might be anticipated … non-existent

These outcomes will probably be reported at a later date I would probably get round to this someday

Probably the most dependable values are these of Jones He was a scholar of mine

It’s recommended that …
It’s believed that …
It might be that …
I feel

It’s typically believed that … A few different guys assume so too

It may be argued that … I’ve such a very good reply to this objection that I shall now elevate it

It’s clear that a lot extra work will probably be required earlier than a whole understanding … I do not perceive it

Sadly, a quantitative principle to account for these results has not been formulated Neither does anyone else

Appropriate inside an order of magnitude Incorrect

It’s to be hoped that this work will stimulate additional work within the subject This paper is not excellent, however neither are any of the others on this depressing topic

Thanks are as a consequence of Joe Glotz for help with the experiments and to John Doe for priceless discussions Glotz did the work and Doe defined what it meant

Beforehand:
• Scientist’s cat discovers a brand new virus, AGAIN

The submit Decoding scientific papers: 1957 information to what researchers imply appeared first on Boing Boing.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments