Auto-posted whereas I am in Tokyo. Working these checks 24/7 on VPS.
I have been operating the identical Gold buying and selling prompts by way of three totally different AI fashions for per week. Identical account, identical knowledgeable advisor (DoIt Alpha Pulse AI), fully totally different considering patterns.
This is what’s truly occurring with Claude, GPT-5, and Gemini once they analyze Gold.
The Take a look at Setup (You Can Replicate This)
The Precise Immediate I am Utilizing
Present XAUUSD: [price] Final 3 H1 candles: [data] Session: [London/NY/Asian] Information at present: [economic calendar] Ought to I: Purchase/Promote/Maintain? Danger: 0.5% max Goal: Danger-reward 1:2 minimal Clarify reasoning in 50 phrases max.
Easy. Clear. Identical for all three fashions.
Testing Situations
- Demo account: $5000
- Every mannequin will get: $1500 allocation
- Identical trades supplied: All three see equivalent setups
- Determination tracked: Even once they say “Maintain”
- Time recorded: Response pace issues
Early Observations (Not Conclusions)
GPT-5: The Overthinker
Response time: 3-5 seconds
GPT-5 retains discovering patterns that may not exist. Yesterday it mentioned:
“The three-candle formation resembles the Could 2023 reversal sample mixed with present DXY weak point suggesting institutional accumulation nevertheless the quantity profile signifies…”
Downside: By the point it finishes considering, the entry is gone.
Attention-grabbing habits: It catches refined correlations. Seen that Gold was ignoring Greenback energy as a result of bond yields have been additionally rising. That is truly refined.
Present standing:
- Alerts generated: 12
- Trades taken: 4 (others too sluggish)
- Win price: 50% (2 wins, 2 losses)
- P&L: +45 pips
Claude Opus 4.1: The Pace Dealer
Response time: 1-2 seconds
Claude makes choices FAST. Generally too quick. Its responses are like:
“Bullish. London open + help held + Greenback weak. Purchase.”
Energy: In quick markets, Claude truly will get fills. Throughout Wednesday’s volatility, it was the one mannequin that caught the reversal.
Weak point: Much less nuanced. Missed the Bond/Gold correlation fully.
Present standing:
- Alerts generated: 18
- Trades taken: 11
- Win price: 54% (6 wins, 5 losses)
- P&L: +72 pips
Gemini 2.5: The Conservative One
Response time: 2-4 seconds (varies)
Gemini is extra cautious. Generally passes on trades the others take. Tuesday it mentioned:
“No clear edge. Recommend ready for higher setup.”
This occurs extra with Gemini than GPT or Claude.
Sudden energy: Danger administration. When unsure, it typically suggests smaller positions. The one mannequin that commonly says “scale back threat to 0.25%” when confidence is decrease.
Minor weak point: Generally TOO conservative, lacking good strikes whereas ready for “good” setups.
Present standing:
- Alerts generated: 9
- Trades taken: 5
- Win price: 60% (3 wins, 2 losses)
- P&L: +38 pips
The Attention-grabbing Discovery: They Generally Disagree
More often than not, they agree on path. However this is what occurred Thursday at London open:
Gold worth: 1952.30
Setup: Break above Asian excessive
- GPT-5: “Await pullback to 1950”
- Claude: “Purchase now, momentum constructing”
- Gemini: “Purchase however smaller place”
Identical bullish bias, totally different approaches to entry.
Claude entered instantly. Gold ran to 1958. Claude acquired the very best entry.
However all three would have been worthwhile – simply totally different quantities.
What’s Really Invaluable Right here
Pace vs Intelligence Commerce-off
- Want quick choices? Claude
- Want deep evaluation? GPT-5
- Want threat administration? Gemini (surprisingly)
Value Per Determination (This Week)
- GPT-5: $0.12 common
- Claude: $0.08 common
- Gemini: $0.06 common
Claude is 33% cheaper AND sooner. However GPT-5’s two wins have been larger (+40 and +35 pips vs Claude’s common of +20).
The “Confidence” Downside
None of those fashions say “I do not know” sufficient. They all the time have an opinion, even once they should not.
I am testing including this to prompts:
If unclear, say "No edge - skip this setup" Confidence required: 70% minimal
Early outcomes: 40% fewer indicators, however higher win price.
The Framework That is Rising
After one week, this is what I am studying:
Use Claude When:
- Information is about to hit (pace issues)
- London/NY session opens (momentum trades)
- You want fast choices on clear setups
Use GPT-5 When:
- Asian session (extra time to suppose)
- Advanced correlations matter
- You may await good entries
Use Gemini When:
- You desire a second opinion
- Danger administration is precedence
- Testing new methods (it is extra conservative)
What’s Really Working Nicely
Clean Operations
One factor that shocked me – DoIt Alpha Pulse AI handles all three fashions with out points:
- No API errors (correct error dealing with inbuilt)
- No price restrict issues (clever request administration)
- Constant connections throughout all fashions
That is truly our aggressive benefit. Whereas others battle with integration, we simply… commerce.
The Actual Variations Are Delicate
The fashions are extra related than totally different. All of them:
- Catch fundamental help/resistance
- Perceive pattern path
- React to main information
The variations are in type, not substance:
- Claude: Direct and quick
- GPT-5: Detailed and considerate
- Gemini: Cautious and measured
The “Clarification Tax”
Asking for reasoning provides:
- 1-2 seconds to response time
- 2x the token price
- Generally overthinking easy setups
Nevertheless it’s price it for studying what the AI “sees”
What I am Testing Subsequent Week
Experiment 1: Consensus Buying and selling
Solely take trades the place 2 of three fashions agree. Idea: Increased conviction setups.
Experiment 2: Time-Based mostly Rotation
- Asian: Gemini (conservative for quiet markets)
- London: Claude (pace for breakouts)
- NY: GPT-5 (complexity of US session)
Experiment 3: Specialised Prompts
As a substitute of 1 immediate for all, optimize for every mannequin’s strengths:
- Claude: Quick, action-focused
- GPT-5: Embody correlation evaluation
- Gemini: Add threat parameters
The Sincere Actuality
After one week of parallel testing, the fashions carry out equally on Gold buying and selling.
All of them catch the apparent strikes. The variations are marginal – perhaps 5-10% efficiency variance. The talent is not selecting the “proper” AI – it is writing higher prompts.
That is why DoIt Alpha Pulse AI helps all of them. Not as a gimmick, however as a result of totally different market circumstances want various kinds of considering.
Your Homework Whereas I am in Japan
You probably have DoIt Alpha Pulse AI, do this:
- Run the identical setup by way of totally different fashions
- Doc once they disagree
- Monitor which one was proper
- Share findings
By the point I am again, we’ll have crowd-sourced knowledge on which mannequin works greatest for what.
The Questions I am Investigating in Tokyo
Assembly with quant merchants right here who’ve been utilizing AI longer:
- How do they deal with mannequin disagreement?
- What’s their strategy to consensus?
- How do they optimize for latency from Asia?
- Are there fashions we’re not contemplating?
Present Scoreboard (Week 1)
Pace Champion: Claude (1-2 seconds)
Accuracy Chief: Gemini (60% win price however small pattern)
Complexity Grasp: GPT-5 (catches refined patterns)
Value Winner: Gemini ($0.06/determination)
Reliability: Claude (most constant)
However keep in mind – that is one week of information. Not conclusions, simply observations.
The Actual Worth of This Experiment
It is not about discovering the “greatest” mannequin. It is about understanding that AI buying and selling technique is not one-size-fits-all.
Your buying and selling type, the pairs you commerce, your threat tolerance – all of them have an effect on which AI mannequin fits you.
That is why the immediate is extra essential than the mannequin. An excellent immediate on Claude beats a nasty immediate on GPT-5 each time.
Need to run your personal AI mannequin experiments?
Get DoIt Alpha Pulse AI – Now $397
Helps all main AI fashions. Swap between them immediately. Discover what works for YOUR buying and selling.
P.S. – Nonetheless in Tokyo. These fashions are operating 24/7 on my VPS. After I verify in from my lodge, I see Claude and GPT-5 arguing about whether or not 1958 is resistance or help. Even AIs cannot agree on fundamental TA.
P.P.S. – If you happen to’re testing fashions your self, doc every little thing. The patterns solely emerge with knowledge, not hunches.
