Monday, March 2, 2026
HomeTechnologyCan the Iranian regime survive after Khamenei?

Can the Iranian regime survive after Khamenei?

Within the weeks main as much as the newest US-Israeli airstrikes towards Iran, there have been experiences that President Donald Trump’s administration was contemplating concentrating on Iran’s senior management, together with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Khamenei himself gave the impression to be getting ready for the tip.

Nonetheless, the truth that the supreme chief was killed in his dwelling workplace in an airstrike on the very first day of the conflict is a shocking growth — the in a single day elimination of one of many central figures in world politics for the final 4 a long time.

Born in humble circumstances within the northeastern metropolis of Mashhad in 1939, Khamenei rose to prominence as a follower of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the chief of Iran’s 1979 revolution, and served two phrases as president within the Nineteen Eighties earlier than succeeding Khomeini as supreme chief after his dying in 1989.

Although seen as one thing of a reasonable earlier than he took over essentially the most senior place within the Iranian regime, Khamenei’s rule was extremely oppressive, significantly for Iranian girls. His tenure included the crushing of a number of giant protest actions, together with the 2009 Inexperienced motion, the 2022 “Lady, Life, Freedom” protests, and the mass motion that broke out in January.

He oversaw the development of an “Axis of Resistance” of governments and proxy teams pushing again towards US and Israeli affect within the Center East — significantly after the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, when Iranian-backed militias fought US troopers — and Iran’s in the end ruinous nuclear enrichment program. However he additionally gave his considerably reluctant approval to the 2015 nuclear cope with the USA and different nations — a call he later regretted after Trump pulled out of the settlement.

It should take a while to kind via Khamenei’s legacy for Iran and the broader area, and to grasp the importance of his dying. However to kind via a few of the preliminary implications, Vox spoke with Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow on the Center East Institute and creator of the guide The Battle of the Ayatollahs in Iran, which examines how the Islamic Republic’s backroom rivalries and management struggles have formed its strategy to the world. This dialog has been edited for size and readability.

These airstrikes didn’t precisely come as a shock. We’ve all been anticipating them for weeks. So what does it inform us about Iran’s preparations that the supreme chief was killed on the very first day of bombing?

A few issues. One, [the Iranians] clearly didn’t do something important when it comes to stopping the infiltration of the state equipment by the US and Israel. Presumably after the 12-day conflict, that ought to have been the massive message. However provided that senior members are being taken out as we communicate, that implies to me that they only couldn’t get their act collectively on that entrance. Then there was clearly miscalculation on their half, additionally, when it comes to studying Trump’s intentions and Israel’s intentions.

I don’t know what to make of Khamenei assembly senior people in his workplace. That nearly looks as if he was asking for dying. He had been speaking rather a lot about martyrdom in current speeches.

However basically, this was a regime that, when it got here to the massive check — its capacity to face as much as the USA — spoke louder than its actions would permit.

How inevitable was it that he’d get so far? Are there steps Khamenei might have taken to keep away from this end result?

For 37 years, mainly, he was on one trajectory: “It’s my approach or the freeway.” He begins off again in 1989 as a 49-year-old, fairly insecure determine. He had had a really insecure presidency. He didn’t assume he would be capable to handle to remain on the high, and the sneakers he needed to fill after Khomeini had been big. Then he spent 37 years attempting to show to himself that he might do it.

However he all the time selected power and coercion and repression as his methodology of conserving himself on the high of the facility pyramid the place he had ample alternative to take heed to his personal folks. Neglect the US, neglect Israel. He might have begun with listening to his personal folks.

He was a really dogmatic speaker. He had his model of Islam that he believed in. He ostracized the overwhelming majority of Iranian society. He created small pockets of supporters, and to him that was adequate and they’d be his foot troopers. I imply, going again to 1991 and all the way in which on to at the moment, there was protest after protest after protest; folks yelling, shouting, “This isn’t how we need to reside our lives.” And he simply refused to take heed to them.

He selected to battle at dwelling, most significantly, but additionally overseas, which basically introduced him to this finish. However he did it, seemingly, together with his eyes open. So completely, sure, he might have been alive at the moment. He didn’t must go this manner.

How a lot of that do you assume was the Islamic Republic’s governing ideology, and the way a lot was simply this one man’s persona?

He was the one shaping the ideology. Clearly, he inherited plenty of issues from his predecessor, the anti-Americanism, the stance on Israel, the forcing folks to embrace this militant model of Islam. These are all issues he inherited. However he might have softened it.

If Khamenei had not turn out to be supreme chief in ’89, say it was somebody like [cleric and former President Akbar Hashemi] Rafsanjani, who got here to a conclusion later in life that he wanted to melt up, Iran might have been a really completely different place.

Plenty of that is rooted in home rivalries. The individuals who stood as much as Khamenei had been by and enormous what we might name “reformists,” so Khamenei needed to carve out an alternate political identification. That’s why somebody who within the Nineteen Eighties was seen as a pragmatist, turns into a hardliner.

He empowers the [Revolutionary Guard Corps]. He provides energy to the safety forces. He turns into a proponent of draconian insurance policies like this compelled hijab, the concept of preventing the People, preventing Israel, investing within the Axis of Resistance. All these are rooted in political rivalries. That was not his future, and now it’s what led to his demise.

Is there one explicit choice you’d level to that outlined him?

Of his 37 years in energy, the final 22 years have been just about dominated by the nuclear concern. He might have gone about it in a really completely different approach. He might have adopted a distinct political rhetoric. He needed it each methods. He needed to speak about being this anti-status quo energy. He took satisfaction and pleasure in standing as much as the USA, in saying that the US can’t do a rattling factor. The home opposition had been then labeled as stooges of the foreigners.

A lot of this bravado was pointless, and it turned out to be empty. He thought the IRGC would save him, however the corruption and all of the mismanagement of the IRGC is the explanation you might have a state in such disarray.

The large gamble within the overseas affairs enviornment was that the Russias and Chinas of this world will come to his support. It completely turned out to be a lie.

However his largest miscalculation was that he refused to have a look at his personal folks and settle for that the folks he was ruling over didn’t actually have a lot sympathy, or didn’t even perceive this worldview, this in search of martyrdom, regardless of the hell meaning. I suppose the phrase is hubris right here. The person actually thought he might outsmart everybody.

Clearly, many Iranians are comfortable to see Khamenei gone, as proven by the celebrations we’re already seeing. However do you assume it issues politically that his elimination was the results of a US and Israeli assault somewhat than compelled by Iranians themselves?

Effectively, the Iranians, the vast majority of whom needed this man gone a method or one other, are grateful. However I believe you even have plenty of questions. Like, Trump in all probability did this for Israel. Tremendous, we’ll take that, however does Trump have a recreation plan after this?

And clearly, a lot will depend upon what occurs on the bottom. If you happen to get extra civilian casualties, if a few of these strikes inside Iran turn out to be indiscriminate, like we’ve already had with this ladies’ college being hit, that would have a severe impression on public sentiment.

There was an announcement at the moment of the formation of a three-member interim council to deal with Khamenei’s duties for now and oversee the transition to new management. Do you assume it is a regime that may regroup, significantly beneath the present circumstances?

If the exterior stress goes away, it’s probably that they will proceed cracking down and killing their very own folks. However that’s the massive query mark: How a lot urge for food does Donald Trump have to remain on this? The Israelis need to keep, however their sources are restricted. So the choice by the US is essential.

One factor to contemplate: if the CIA is in Iran and might monitor precisely the place Khamenei is and provides that data to the Israelis, that tells you they’ve plenty of property and capability on the bottom. Can they use that capability to create defections, to create some kind of acceptance [among senior leaders] of a necessity to finish the Islamic Republic?

That’s one choice. The extra hopeful choice for the opposition is somebody from exterior the regime taking on, which, I believe, is what the vast majority of Iranians need, however there’s a great distance from wanting one thing to having one thing. And I’m undecided if there’s urge for food within the White Home for what it requires to assist these folks arrange from the surface to take over.

The opposite dangerous state of affairs is that [the interim government] stays in energy in pockets, together with Tehran, however in the remainder of the nation, you might have the pockets that emerge as semi-independent, type of like Kurdistan [in Iraq].

Who’re the figures within the regime we ought to be watching as a possible successor?

One is somebody I wrote a profile on six years in the past. His identify is Alireza Arafi. [A senior cleric and protege of Khamenei, Arafi is a member of Iran’s powerful 12-member Guardian Council.] He’s the most certainly on this three-person interim council, with [President Masoud] Pezeshkian and [Supreme Court Chief Justice Gholam-Hossein] Mohseni-Ejei. I do not know when it comes to whether or not he’s going to be the one.

The formal approach of doing that is to carry a gathering of the Meeting of Specialists [the body tasked with selecting the supreme leader], however simply logistically, that’s not more likely to occur. No person’s going to ask 88 previous males to point out up in the midst of a conflict zone.

So you bought the interim council for now. And of the three, Arafi is the one who has been groomed by Khamenei. Whether or not that’s factor or a nasty factor, time will present.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments