
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
Perhaps it’s simply the sheer variety of telephones that cross my desk, however I’ve a love-hate relationship with USB-C. It’s nice that I can cost my headphones, laptop computer, and newest Android smartphones with the identical plug, however determining whether or not my devices are literally charging optimally is commonly only a matter of shrugging and hoping for the perfect.
As I’ve whined about numerous instances, USB-C nonetheless has too many alternative flavors for quick charging. Whether or not that’s proprietary choices like OnePlus’ SuperVOOC or Xiaomi’s HyperCharge, customary USB Energy Supply, or one of many newer USB PD PPS modes, with umpteen telephones flying throughout my desk every year, preserving monitor of precisely what I must cost every one effectively is close to not possible. Throw within the complication of 3A, 5A, and 6A USB-C cables, and there’s little hope for shoppers to grasp why their telephone is perhaps charging slowly — even I’ve to resort to my trusty energy meter.
Android tries to assist, a minimum of considerably, by letting you understand whether or not your charger is delivering a good stage of energy. I’m certain you’ve all clocked your telephone’s “quick charging” or “X minutes to full” lockscreen textual content snippet. Whereas displaying the time remaining is useful for gauging whether or not you’re charging unusually slowly, it doesn’t assist customers diagnose why issues is perhaps off.
Between plugs, protocols, and cables, it’s totally troublesome to know in case your telephone is charging optimally.
Android 15 improved the setup a bit for Pixel telephones by boosting its “quick” charging snippet from a pitiful 7.5W to a modest 20W. Nevertheless, the variation of user-facing prompts throughout telephone manufacturers stays inconsistent, if I’m being well mannered, as a result of the setup is totally open for manufacturers to flavour how they need. As an instance simply how messy it’s, I examined 4 telephones with 4 USB-C chargers and logged what every one stories on the lockscreen and the precise energy stage.
Primary USB-A | Quick USB-A | 30W USB-C PD | 240W USB-C PPS | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Galaxy S25 Extremely |
Primary USB-A
N/A |
Quick USB-A
“Quick Charging” |
30W USB-C PD
“Tremendous Quick Charging” |
240W USB-C PPS
“Tremendous Quick Charging 2.0” |
OnePlus 13 |
Primary USB-A
“Charging” |
Quick USB-A
“Charging” |
30W USB-C PD
“Extremely-fast Charging” |
240W USB-C PPS
“Extremely-fast Charging” |
Pixel 9 Professional XL |
Primary USB-A
N/A |
Quick USB-A
“Charging” |
30W USB-C PD
“Quick Charging” |
240W USB-C PPS
“Quick Charging” |
Xiaomi 15 Extremely |
Primary USB-A
“Charging” |
Quick USB-A
“Fast Cost” |
30W USB-C PD
“Quick Charging” |
240W USB-C PPS
“Quick Charging” |
The sheer energy vary that Xiaomi considers as “quick charging” is simply bonkers, because it’ll make over an hour of distinction in the event you’re charging at 27W versus 90W. The Xiaomi 15 Extremely does have a completely totally different lockscreen charging animation in the event you use a HyperCharge plug, however that arguably makes the state of affairs even worse, as a “customary” PPS charger works simply as properly. But, the person has no approach of understanding.
OnePlus isn’tmuch higher, with an enormous window between average and most charging energy labelled as “ultra-fast.” Once more, there are some additional animations for utilizing a SuperVOOC charger for absolutely the quickest speeds, however you received’t know the distinction except you may have a number of chargers at hand. In contrast, Google’s Pixel 9 Professional XL makes it unclear whether or not you’re charging on the full 37W energy stage or the older, slower restrict, which is hardly useful when its 20V PPS necessities are fairly area of interest.
One’s model’s definition of quick is one other model’s sluggish.
Equally perplexing is the sheer vary of energy ranges marked as “quick charging” throughout this small snippet of the Android ecosystem. Relying on which telephone you’re taking a look at, something between 15W and 90W might be labeled merely as “quick” however with very totally different implications for the time taken to cost up. Granted, most house owners will doubtless solely ever be taking a look at a single handset at a time, however they shouldn’t actually be anticipated to regulate to new nomenclature when switching telephones.
In search of positives, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Extremely has the clearest definition, with a logical development of textual content as you progress as much as quicker and quicker charging. I don’t suppose many will concentrate on the distinction between Extremely-fast charging 1.0 and a couple of.0, however a minimum of there’s some indication to the person after they’re charging the telephone as shortly as doable. It’ll be fascinating to see how the model handles the reported choice of a 60W charging stage for the upcoming Galaxy S26 Extremely.
Android ought to put everybody on the identical web page

Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
In the event that they’re studying, I’ve some strategies for Google’s engineers. The time-to-full estimate is an efficient start line, however elevating the bar for the ‘charging quickly’ immediate is a should. 20W hasn’t been ‘quick’ for near a decade; Android’s default ought to most likely be set at 40W+ for ultra-fast, 18W+ for regular, and something under that being sluggish. USB Energy Supply’s 18W is a regular baseline for many trendy smartphones, in spite of everything.
Nonetheless, this stays fairly arbitrary, as energy ranges change throughout a battery cost cycle. What begins at 37W can shortly fall to 18W but nonetheless be labeled as “speedy,” as there’s no accounting for a way lengthy charging will actually take — simply which plug you occur to be utilizing.
A wiser choice can be to take away energy from the image and transfer completely to a time-based calculation, permitting some leeway between handset battery capacities and charging designs. This is able to additionally permit the notification to develop into far more dynamic and assist take the guesswork out of how briskly charging actually works for shoppers.
Let’s take energy of the image and give attention to cost instances.
I’d take the basic “time to full metric” and divide it by the remaining cost to offer the customers a clearer concept of whether or not the telephone is at the moment topping up shortly or slowly. Something taking up 1:30 from empty can be thought of sluggish, however something that’ll high up in beneath 45 minutes can be undeniably quick. Likewise, a telephone on 75% battery that also has half an hour left can be sluggish, however simply one other quarter-hour to full can be fast. This manner, manufacturers wouldn’t be capable of label their telephones as charging ‘tremendous quick’ after they clearly aren’t.
Android may go additional with the adoption of improved battery well being metrics and supply optionally available info past crude estimates — temperature info, charging protocols, and precise energy ranges. Any and all of those might be helpful to extra discovered gadget customers to assist them determine which chargers and cables are working finest for his or her particular machine. Maybe even use a bit of that machine studying magic to make quarterly strategies for prolonging long-term well being and bettering charging habits, or a toggle to let customers shortly allow or disable quick charging. There are many methods Android may make charging extra clear and intuitive.
However possibly I’m getting forward of myself. I’d accept a extra strong lockscreen snippet that lets us all know when our telephones are charging optimally. If OEMs can’t be trusted to do it, Google ought to bake it into Android itself.
Thanks for being a part of our group. Learn our Remark Coverage earlier than posting.