Saturday, May 30, 2026
HomeBitcoinbitcoin core - Previous non-HD pockets.dat caught round 96.21% after IBD seems...

bitcoin core – Previous non-HD pockets.dat caught round 96.21% after IBD seems full — pockets rescan or bottleneck?

I’m attempting to know the state of an previous Bitcoin Core pockets synchronization / rescan.

Context:

  • Pockets sort: previous legacy / non-HD pockets.dat, possible created round 2009–2011
  • Machine: devoted MacBook Professional 2022/2023
  • Bitcoin Core runs 24/7
  • Sleep is disabled through: sudo pmset -a disablesleep 1
  • The machine is used just for Bitcoin Core
  • Web connection is steady LAN / fiber
  • Present GUI progress: about 96.21%
  • First documented progress: 94.46% on 2023-11-19
  • Vital later factors:
    • 2025-12-21: 96.00%
    • 2026-01-15: 96.04%
    • 2026-02-27: 96.10%
    • 2026-04-17: 96.17%
    • present: 96.21%
  • The info listing is round 80 GB
  • The GUI at present reveals 0.00000000 BTC
  • I used to be informed there could also be many keys within the pockets keypool, presumably a whole bunch or 1000’s
  • I used to be additionally informed that round 36,612 blocks should still be open / unprocessed

In debug.log I repeatedly see traces like:

UpdateTip … progress=1.000000

I additionally see a number of traces like:

[net:warning] pcp: Couldn’t obtain response: Connection refused (61)

I do NOT see apparent errors resembling:

  • corrupt
  • database error
  • pockets.dat corrupt
  • can’t rescan past pruned peak
  • reindex required

My questions:

Previous legacy/non-HD pockets.dat: Bitcoin Core has been extraordinarily sluggish since 2023. The GUI is at present at 96.21%, the pockets reveals 0 BTC, and debug.log repeatedly reveals UpdateTip ... progress=1.000000 with no seen DB/corruption errors.

Does this point out a standard however very sluggish pockets rescan/DB bottleneck after accomplished IBD, or does it counsel a configuration/downside state?

thanks upfront!

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments