The US authorities has filed a letter opposing the introduction of an amicus transient from the digital asset advocacy group DeFi Schooling Fund because the court docket considers a potential retrial for 2 brothers allegedly behind a $25 million exploit of the Ethereum blockchain.
In a Tuesday submitting within the US District Court docket for the Southern District of New York, interim US Lawyer Jay Clayton submitted a letter to Decide Jessica Clarke requesting {that a} transient from the DeFi Schooling Fund (DEF) not be accepted whereas the court docket considers a movement to dismiss the case towards Anton and James Peraire-Bueno.
“Indifferent from the trial file, the transient merely recites authorized arguments already rejected by this Court docket,” mentioned Clayton, referring to the DeFi Schooling Fund’s amicus transient, including:
“Right here, the place the Court docket has already dominated on the authorized points introduced within the amicus transient and DEF doesn’t supply any distinctive info related to the pending movement earlier than the Court docket, DEF’s submission shouldn’t be more likely to help the Court docket’s consideration of the actual points [over a motion to acquit].”
In November, Clarke declared a mistrial within the case after jurors didn’t agree on whether or not to convict or acquit the brothers, alleged to have dedicated the exploit utilizing automated maximal extractable worth (MEV) bots. Inside per week, the US authorities requested the court docket schedule a retrial for the brothers “as quickly as practicable in late February or early March 2026.”
Associated: Crypto lawyer says SAFE Crypto Act might deter scammers
In keeping with a proposed draft of the DEF transient filed on Dec. 19, the group supported the movement to acquit or dismiss the indictment, arguing that the case had “broader implications” for the trade.
“[P]rosecutions like this one carry ambiguity and worry to software program builders, chilling participation in DeFi and driving members overseas,” mentioned DEF, including: “The DOJ mustn’t get forward of potential lawmaking by bringing indictments primarily based on ill-fitting interpretations of current legislation, which can stifle progress by sowing confusion concerning the governing guidelines.”
Cointelegraph reached out to the DeFi Schooling Fund for remark, however had not obtained a response on the time of publication.
Crypto trade weighs in on implications of case
With the way forward for the Peraire-Bueno brothers unsure, many within the crypto trade are nonetheless trying to how the case might have an effect on MEV-related actions.
Crypto advocacy group Coin Heart filed an amicus transient in the course of the prison trial, arguing towards the US authorities’s concept of the case. Prosecutors additionally requested that the court docket not settle for the transient.
The brothers initially confronted fees of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, cash laundering and conspiracy to obtain stolen property. If retried on the identical fees and located responsible, they may probably be sentenced to as much as 20 years in jail for every depend.
Journal: When privateness and AML legal guidelines battle: Crypto initiatives’ not possible selection
